
On November 18, Japanese whaling ships left to begin an expedition to hunt over 1,000 whales. There were photos of schoolchildren happily waving the ships off as they left the harbor, as if the hunters were national heroes. Yay for killing whales! Yay for being stubborn, selfish and violent liars!

This year, they will be taking humpback whales in addition to minke and fin whales. It’s not enough that they go after whales, period…no, they have to go after one of the most beloved, iconic whales alive. Way to stir up strong feelings from the anti-whaling community.

It makes no sense whatsoever. The Japanese say they need to kill these whales to gauge their impact on the fish stocks. They do it because they exploit a loophole in the 1986 ban in commercial whaling set forth by the International Whaling Commission; whaling is permitted if it is done for “research” purposes. So that’s what they say they are doing, every year: culling whales to study their stomach contents to see how many fish they are eating, as well as study things like their earwax (yes, it’s true…they apparently can garner some very important information from the wax found in the ear canal of a whale) and reproductive organs for clues as to how the fish stocks are doing.
Yes, very scientific work, indeed. Very serious. So serious, in fact, that they are taking great pains to make sure all parts of these whales are used. And that is why whale meat can be found in stores, restaurants and even school lunches in Japan.
It’s sustainability. But for whom?
Does this help the whale populations? I doubt it. I’ve seen some sources that say the whale populations are rebounding and growing each year, and at the same time I read other documents that mention that although the populations are growing, it is still only a mere fraction of what their numbers were before whaling was out of control in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Does this help the fish populations? I don’t see how it can, logically speaking. Japan is worried that it will deplete its fish stocks in the future because it’s no longer a matter of dropping a net in the ocean and having it fill with thousands of fish within seconds. It’s harder now because there are fewer fish in the ocean. And it’s not because of whales and apex predators like sharks eating all the fish. It doesn’t take a genius to realize it’s because humans are OVERFISHING. Ever stop and think about how many more sushi restaurants you see now than you did only ten years ago? Or wonder why almost every major dish in Japanese cuisine uses seafood of some kind? Where do you think all that fish is coming from to keep the sushi restaurants and, well, the whole country of Japan, in business? The oceans. Yes, some come from fish farms, but you can’t farm enough fish to keep the stock sustainable, not with the rate that they are taken.
So it seems that the population that is actually being sustained here is the human population. We have to keep feeding all the people that are born every single day on this planet, and to do that, we have to grow more food, process more fresh water, raise more livestock, and catch more fish. And it’s not as if this wealth of resources is available everywhere, so it’s not spread out—it’s concentrated in high-density, developed parts of the world. More people than ever, eating more than ever, wasting more than ever. I wonder how this cycle can slow down, or even reverse itself, so that we can actually attain true sustainability of this entire planet. I’m not a scientist, so I don’t have any answers, of course. I just know I support anyone who is working towards a balanced future. A future that takes all elements of the natural world into a more equal account.
And here is where I make my unattractive, mean-spirited and evil statement about how I feel:
Human overpopulation is the number one problem facing this world, in my opinion. Too many damn people. We’re living longer, and there are more of us. Birth rates in certain populations are just booming. Our impact alone on this planet is enough to bring it to its knees. We’re the cause of the downward spiral, and if there were fewer of us, maybe things could start to tilt towards a balance again.
I’m not saying we KILL people. Or promote abortions, or anything like that… but I do say we promote birth control. Make it a culture of prevention. To do it on a wide scale, though, you’d need the Catholic Church to step into the 21st century and change its stance on this topic. And other religions to begin to embrace it, as well, as a part of today’s life.
Because it’s not about STOPPING life. It’s actually about sustaining life. ALL life. Not just humans. For our own long-term good, we can’t continue to behave as selfishly as we have been.
And that brings me back to the whales. Don’t they deserve to have life, just as much as the Japanese do? Why is it that all of the other countries in the IWC (except for Norway, those bastards) have accepted the ban on commercial whaling? Could they all be wrong? Is the lack of whaling going to have negative impacts on these countries down the road? Will they all run out of fish? Will the oceans be crammed with too many whales?
No, of course not.
Clearly there was some logic at work in creating the IWC itself in the first place. And there were reasons that the ban went into effect. Maybe it was the sensitive argument, about whales being sentient, warm-blooded beings that are somehow ‘better’ than your average fish…maybe it was a general concern for the natural food chain… maybe it made economic sense to stop the practice. Whatever the reasons, some very powerful countries respect this ban.
Japan is a world power. They have clout. And yet, they risk their international reputation and goodwill by continuing to hunt a resource that is highly controversial to the rest of the world. Australia is fighting mad that these Japanese hunting fleets will be harpooning whales within sanctuary waters off of Antarctica. These ships will pass through Australian waters, and kill whales that migrate to those waters to mate and feed. Australia holds whales in very high regard, and the fact that Japan would be such a poor neighbor in this way not only hurts relations but completely steps on another country’s conservation efforts. How is that right?
Right now, the whaling ships are en route to the killing grounds. Whales are going to die slow, violent deaths. It can take up to an hour for a whale to die from an explosive harpoon. Mothers will be taken from calves. Pods will be decimated. Other countries will be angered, and the Japanese will suffer backlash. Is it really all worth it, just so that some whale meat can be served up on plates? Is it worth the questionable scientific data that will supposedly be gleaned from this slaughter? (“We have determined that yes, whales eat fish. But we’re gonna have to catch another thousand or so to PROVE it.”)

I’m not about to board a Greenpeace boat and try to intercept the ships and stop the harpoons, but I definitely have no reservations about joining the large international community of intelligent people who see no real reason for this hunt to continue. This might just be one stupid little blog in a sea of millions, but that doesn’t matter. I just want to get it out there, period.
My favorite part of this whole issue is when Japanese scientists make serious public statements about the importance of this research, and why it is necessary and defending their best intentions…and at the same time, reporters will gather quotes from Japanese citizens who say things like, “We should be allowed to hunt whales because it is our tradition, and whale meat tastes good.” The press is easily uncovering the true common public opinion, making those scientists sound like hypocrites and liars. (It’s also interesting that there are a lot of articles written about how the whale meat is going to waste. Apparently, it’s not selling as fast as the traditional-whale-eating people thought it would; the younger generation is not really interested in eating whale meat. The government is pushing it in schools, making kids eat it for lunch…seemingly forcing the younger kids to support whaling, and sometimes whale meat is ending up in pet food because they don’t know what else to do with it. Maybe it’s just me, but it seems like all the indicators are in place to make a clear argument against whaling—if only the stubbornness of the Japanese leaders can be overcome.)








